Team for Daggers

OK, I know it's been fucking ages a while since my last post but there are very good reasons for that. Mostly they involve laziness, but getting a job has also used up a lot of time that could have been better spent pondering the subtle nuances of such things as the diamond formation, Terry Brown's future at the club, and James Mulley's Twitter feed.

So, now that I've bothered to put pen to paper fingers to keyboard, here, complete with some dodgy formatting after a disappointing effort to copy-and-paste from Microsoft Word, are some thoughts on team selection:

Every football fan likes to do the manager’s job and indulge in a little bit of team selection every now and then. From the safety of the home/office /pub/rehab clinic, free from any repercussions should their team actually start a game, they offer forth a selection of selections that range from the eminently sensible to the wildly optimistic which - while initally sounding brilliant - often do, on closer scrutiny, actually contain 15 players without a left back among them. From intricate Christmas trees to dynamic diamonds to stifling defensive formations, the fan can let his creativity run riot, safe in the knowledge that the bumbling fool of a manager whose job the fan could do oh-so-much better if given the chance will never actually field the eleven that the fan selects. But even if the manager does select the fan's team and, by a series of unlucky bounces, one-in-a-million goals from the opposition, misjudged substitutions and dodgy refereeing, the fan’s team loses, the fan can quietly skulk away from his proudly announced selection, safe in the knowledge that no-one will remember what he said in the first place any longer than it takes someone to ask what the travel arrangements are for the next away game. And if, joy of joys, the team actually wins, the fan has a free pass to smugville until at least the next game.

With that in mind, I’m going to be foolish enough to commit my team for the Dagenham and Redbridge game to writing, and post it on the Great Source of Truth that is the Internet, so that all and sundry can come from miles around (figuratively speaking, obviously) and mock my pitiful attempts at football intelligence.

But – I’ve decided not to settle for just one team. I’ve picked a few, each with their own pros and cons, just to explore what different options are available to Terry Brown. And quite possibly, when they all turn out to be bobbins, to highlight just how deep in the Brown stuff we really are.

First up, solid and defensive:

                                              Brown

Franks                  MMK                    Stuart                  Gwillim

Hatton                  Moncur                 S. Moore             Bush

                             Midson                  L. Moore

I could easily have chosen C-Mac or Brett Johnson to partner MMK, but I’ve included Jamie Stuart just for an extra bit of determination and psychosis. And I wasn’t sure as to who would partner Midson up front. Christian Jolley has shown an ability to launch himself into the occasional ill-advised lunging tackle, but he’s not disciplined enough to win a place in this team. Euell staked a claim with a Jolley-esque lunge that bought him a yellow card on Tuesday night, but I’ve gone for Luke Moore on the basis of the consistently waspish nature of his performances this season.

Pros: Solid. As full-backs themselves, Bush and Hatton would know to track back and help out FF and GG. Sammy Moore has been excellent in the holding role, and if he and Moncur can forge any sort of understanding, we should have a very well protected defence.

Cons: FF isn’t totally comfortable at right back – he didn’t exactly cover himself in glory when he played there at Port Vale, being substituted at half time. Three of the four midfielders would be playing in positions they don’t normally occupy. Very little attacking threat. 'Solid' by Wimbledon standards is the same as 'Normal' by most other teams' standards.

Who’s missing? I think Toks has been one of our better players this season, and has been unlucky to lose his place with the arrival of the loanees, and he’d miss out again in this team. And there have been times when Billy Knott seems to be playing a different game to everyone else on the pitch, such is his quality, but there’s no place for him if we’re trying to grind out results.

Next up, the super attacking dazzling diamond formation:

        Turner

Hatton                  Johnson                C-Mac                   Bush

                                             S. Moore

          Yussuff                                                             Knott

                                             L. Moore

                               Midson                 Jolley

Now that everyone is fit again, TB has, for the first time in a long time, the option of selecting what is essentially the team with which we had so much success for the first twelve games of the season, but with MMK in place of Jamie Stuart, and Billy Knott in place of Lee Minshull. Which isn’t a bad swap really, is it?

Pro: If it all comes together, we’d run rings around Dagenham and Redbridge

Con: Given our poor form and low morale, it probably wouldn’t come together. And it’s just too lightweight – Daggers would bully us off the ball before we’d even got to tiki, never mind taka.

Pro: There would be goals

Con: For Dagenham

Who’s missing? For the purposes of this exercise, Jack gets the nod ahead of Seb for his better distribution skills, although Seb is always going to be the first choice keeper. GG could easily come in for Bush as Billy is more attacking than Minsh ever was, but I’ve gone for the more positive option. Again, the centre back pairing is a tricky one to call but I’ve chosen the two that I think are the best ball players. And let’s face it, our defence has looked pretty shonky whoever we’ve had in the centre and this pairing’s only outing ended with a 3-1 victory over what was then an in-form Gillingham team. So captain Stuart and big signing MMK miss out in favour of a giraffe and someone who’s played very little league football for us. Toks gets the nod over Moncur, though in my mind there’s very little to choose between them, nostalgia for the early days of the season just clinching it for Toks.

The Wellard 4-5-1:

        Brown

     Hatton              MMK                     C-Mac                   Gwillim

                                            S. Moore

Yussuff                                                     L. Moore              Knott

                                Wellard                    

                                            Midson

As you can probably tell, I had trouble working out how to show this formation but, in broad terms, it revolves around Wellard playing “in the hole” with midfielders getting forward to support Midson whenever possible, or holding back if we’re protecting a lead. Yeah, right, as if we’d ever take the lead.

Pros: Looked good for 45 minutes against Oxford, to be thwarted only by Andy D’Urso’s refusal to award blatant penalties. Even though his contribution when we haven’t got the ball isn’t strong enough to get him a place in a four man midfield, Wellard’s link play, passing, and close control means we should be able to have the lion’s share of possession.

Cons: With just Midson up front, and goals from a shot-shy midfield a rarity, we might not make much use of that possession.

Who’s missing? Again, Toks edges it over Moncur and with Knott on the left, the more solid GG edges it over Bush. No place either for Christian Jolley, who’d be an “impact substitute” in this team. Or he could play wide left in place of Billy Knott in a team that didn’t include any loanees.

4-3-3 with both Harrison and Jolley:

Anyone who saw the Hereford game will understand why I won’t even bother writing this one out.

Conclusions etc:

Jason Euell doesn’t get a place in any of the teams. While his arrival created a buzz and lifted spirits, I haven’t seen or heard of anything that justifies him getting a starting place ahead of, say, Luke Moore. And neither does Byron Harrison feature. Not because I don’t rate him, but Midson is the first name on the teamsheet and if you’re going to have two up front, then it’s got to be Christian Jolley, no?

So, after all that, what would be my selection? I really don’t know. I’m just glad I don’t have to make the decision for real. Oh, all right then, I’ll stick my neck out and say that I'd go for the Wellard 4-5-1, but if it turns out he's not fit enough to start, I'd go for this:

                                                Brown

Hatton                  MMK                    C-Mac                  Gwillim

L. Moore              Moncur                 S. Moore               Knott

                             Midson                  Jolley

Subs: Harrison, Toks, Johnson, Turner, Wellard

Which means Euell, Djilali, Stuart and Bush would miss out altogether.

Discuss.